Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama.

In the letter the firm responds to a recent letter from Parks, in which he protested an advertisement that appeared in The New York Times to solicit funds for Martin Luther King, Jr.'s legal defense. The firm argues that the newspaper is not responsible for the content of the ad, and it questio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Electronic
Published: Alabama Department of Archives and History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3439
format Electronic
collection Alabama Textual Materials Collection
building Alabama Department of Archives and History
publisher Alabama Department of Archives and History
topic Alabama documents
spellingShingle Alabama documents
Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama.
fulltopic Alabama documents
Lord, Day & Lord; Parks, Franklin, W.; Actions and defenses; Litigation; New York Times Company--Trials, litigation, etc.; Newspapers--New York
description In the letter the firm responds to a recent letter from Parks, in which he protested an advertisement that appeared in The New York Times to solicit funds for Martin Luther King, Jr.'s legal defense. The firm argues that the newspaper is not responsible for the content of the ad, and it questions Parks' objection to it: "We have been investigating the matter and are somewhat puzzled as to how you think the statements in any way reflect you. So far, our investigation would seem to indicate that the statements are substantially correct..."
spelling Q0000025048 - Q0000025049Q25048 - Q25049Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama.In the letter the firm responds to a recent letter from Parks, in which he protested an advertisement that appeared in The New York Times to solicit funds for Martin Luther King, Jr.'s legal defense. The firm argues that the newspaper is not responsible for the content of the ad, and it questions Parks' objection to it: "We have been investigating the matter and are somewhat puzzled as to how you think the statements in any way reflect you. So far, our investigation would seem to indicate that the statements are substantially correct..."1960 April 151960-04-151960-1969Lord, Day & Lord; Parks, Franklin, W.; Actions and defenses; Litigation; New York Times Company--Trials, litigation, etc.; Newspapers--New YorkTextCorrespondenceNachman, M. RolandM. Roland Nachman, Jr., records from New York Times vs. Sullivan and related casesLPR252, Box 1v32895Alabama Department of Archives and History, 624 Washington Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36130EnglishThis material may be protected under U. S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S. Code) which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. Though ADAH has physical ownership of the material in its collections, in some cases we may not own the copyright to the material. It is the patron's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright restrictions when publishing or otherwise distributing materials found in our collections.600 PPI TIFFhttp://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3439
title Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama.
titleStr Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama.
url http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3439
id ADAHvoices3439
thumbnail http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getthumbnail/collection/voices/id/3439
_version_ 1806566342707380224