Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama.
In the letter the firm responds to a recent letter from Parks, in which he protested an advertisement that appeared in The New York Times to solicit funds for Martin Luther King, Jr.'s legal defense. The firm argues that the newspaper is not responsible for the content of the ad, and it questio...
Format: | Electronic |
---|---|
Published: |
Alabama Department of Archives and History
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3439 |
format |
Electronic |
---|---|
collection |
Alabama Textual Materials Collection |
building |
Alabama Department of Archives and History |
publisher |
Alabama Department of Archives and History |
topic |
Alabama documents |
spellingShingle |
Alabama documents Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama. |
fulltopic |
Alabama documents Lord, Day & Lord; Parks, Franklin, W.; Actions and defenses; Litigation; New York Times Company--Trials, litigation, etc.; Newspapers--New York |
description |
In the letter the firm responds to a recent letter from Parks, in which he protested an advertisement that appeared in The New York Times to solicit funds for Martin Luther King, Jr.'s legal defense. The firm argues that the newspaper is not responsible for the content of the ad, and it questions Parks' objection to it: "We have been investigating the matter and are somewhat puzzled as to how you think the statements in any way reflect you. So far, our investigation would seem to indicate that the statements are substantially correct..." |
spelling |
Q0000025048 - Q0000025049Q25048 - Q25049Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama.In the letter the firm responds to a recent letter from Parks, in which he protested an advertisement that appeared in The New York Times to solicit funds for Martin Luther King, Jr.'s legal defense. The firm argues that the newspaper is not responsible for the content of the ad, and it questions Parks' objection to it: "We have been investigating the matter and are somewhat puzzled as to how you think the statements in any way reflect you. So far, our investigation would seem to indicate that the statements are substantially correct..."1960 April 151960-04-151960-1969Lord, Day & Lord; Parks, Franklin, W.; Actions and defenses; Litigation; New York Times Company--Trials, litigation, etc.; Newspapers--New YorkTextCorrespondenceNachman, M. RolandM. Roland Nachman, Jr., records from New York Times vs. Sullivan and related casesLPR252, Box 1v32895Alabama Department of Archives and History, 624 Washington Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36130EnglishThis material may be protected under U. S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S. Code) which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. Though ADAH has physical ownership of the material in its collections, in some cases we may not own the copyright to the material. It is the patron's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright restrictions when publishing or otherwise distributing materials found in our collections.600 PPI TIFFhttp://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3439 |
title |
Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama. |
titleStr |
Letter from the law firm of Lord, Day & Lord in New York, to Franklin W. Parks, city commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama. |
url |
http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3439 |
id |
ADAHvoices3439 |
thumbnail |
http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getthumbnail/collection/voices/id/3439 |
_version_ |
1806566342707380224 |