Copy of a letter from John Coffee and James Bright in Huntsville, Alabama, to John McKinley.
In the letter Coffee and Bright explain that Clemens and Keys of Mooresville is responsible for removing a bridge at Cotton Port: "That bridge had been built by the Cottonport Company for which they paid $1650 and esteemed it as a very valuable acquisition to that town, and of great use and val...
Format: | Electronic |
---|---|
Published: |
Alabama Department of Archives and History
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3149 |
format |
Electronic |
---|---|
collection |
Alabama Textual Materials Collection |
building |
Alabama Department of Archives and History |
publisher |
Alabama Department of Archives and History |
topic |
Alabama documents |
spellingShingle |
Alabama documents Copy of a letter from John Coffee and James Bright in Huntsville, Alabama, to John McKinley. |
fulltopic |
Alabama documents Bright, James; Coffee, John, 1772-1833; McKinley, John, 1780-1852; Legal services--Alabama; Real property--Alabama; Cotton Port (Ala.); Limestone County (Ala.) |
description |
In the letter Coffee and Bright explain that Clemens and Keys of Mooresville is responsible for removing a bridge at Cotton Port: "That bridge had been built by the Cottonport Company for which they paid $1650 and esteemed it as a very valuable acquisition to that town, and of great use and value to the people generally who wished to travel in that direction. The Cottonport Company are not disposed to submit to so great an injury without reparation, and are determined to use coersive [sic] measures to recover the damages sustained." They intend to file a suit against Clemens and Keys, and they want McKinley to represent them. |
spelling |
Q0000021678 - Q0000021680Q21678 - Q21680Copy of a letter from John Coffee and James Bright in Huntsville, Alabama, to John McKinley.In the letter Coffee and Bright explain that Clemens and Keys of Mooresville is responsible for removing a bridge at Cotton Port: "That bridge had been built by the Cottonport Company for which they paid $1650 and esteemed it as a very valuable acquisition to that town, and of great use and value to the people generally who wished to travel in that direction. The Cottonport Company are not disposed to submit to so great an injury without reparation, and are determined to use coersive [sic] measures to recover the damages sustained." They intend to file a suit against Clemens and Keys, and they want McKinley to represent them.1821 July 241821-07-241820-1829Bright, James; Coffee, John, 1772-1833; McKinley, John, 1780-1852; Legal services--Alabama; Real property--Alabama; Cotton Port (Ala.); Limestone County (Ala.)TextCorrespondenceCoffee, JohnJohn Coffee papersSPR709v34511Alabama Department of Archives and History, 624 Washington Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36130EnglishThis material may be protected under U. S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S. Code) which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. Though ADAH has physical ownership of the material in its collections, in some cases we may not own the copyright to the material. It is the patron's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright restrictions when publishing or otherwise distributing materials found in our collections.600 PPI TIFFhttp://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3149 |
title |
Copy of a letter from John Coffee and James Bright in Huntsville, Alabama, to John McKinley. |
titleStr |
Copy of a letter from John Coffee and James Bright in Huntsville, Alabama, to John McKinley. |
url |
http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/voices/id/3149 |
id |
ADAHvoices3149 |
thumbnail |
http://cdm17217.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getthumbnail/collection/voices/id/3149 |
_version_ |
1816185818201456641 |